Conflitos socioambientais em áreas de complexos portuários na Amazônia paraense: ameaças, agentes e resistências

Este artigo aborda conflitos socioambientais decorrentes da construção de complexos portuários no estado do Pará a partir de três parâmetros de análise: ameaças às comunidades tradicionais, agentes envolvidos e formas de resistências daquelas comunidades. Em função da pandemia do novo coronavírus (SARS-COV-2), os procedimentos metodológicos foram redefinidos, utilizando-se da técnica de Revisão Sistemática de Literatura (RSL) agregada à pesquisa documental, observação in loco e entrevistas realizadas na comunidade de Guajará de Beja, município de Abaetetuba, um dos lócus da pesquisa. Da aplicação do Protocolo de Pesquisa (PP) da RSL resultaram dez estudos selecionados, os quais, após análise agregada aos demais procedimentos metodológicos, indicaram que as disputas por recursos naturais/locacionais, em especial para instalação de complexos portuários no estado do Pará, têm produzido conflitos socioambientais entre agentes econômicos, agentes públicos e comunidades tradicionais na Amazônia paraense.Alternate :This article addresses socio-environmental conflicts arising from the construction of port complexes in the state of Pará from 03 (communities) parameters of analysis - threats to traditional communities, agents involved and forms of complex resistance. Due to the new coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) pandemic, the methodological procedures were redefined, using the Systematic Literature Review (RSL) technique combined with documentary research, on-site observation and interviews carried out in the community of Guajará de research Beja, municipality of Abaetetuba, one of the locus of the research. The application of the RSL Research Protocol/PP resulted in 10 (ten) selected studies which, after being added to the other methodological procedures, indicating that as natural/locational resources, especially for the analysis of port complexes in the state of Pará, companies socio-environmental producers between local agents for audiences and traditional communities in the Amazon.

Estonian Men Over 65 Are More Willing to Use Digital Technology

Digital technology offers older people an excellent opportunity to cope independently, which has become particularly apparent now in times of the COVID-19 crisis. Computers and smart devices provide additional access to a variety of online health-related information and communication with healthcare professionals, as well as digital health-related applications. Research suggests that while men are interested in digital solutions, women are more likely to seek online health information and exhibit better health behavior. The article aims to critically examine gender differences in digital technology acceptance for health purposes, online health information seeking, and COVID-19 vaccine readiness among older adults living in the small Eastern European country of Estonia. Data on the 65+ age group (65 men and 116 women) were derived from a larger survey, which contained a representative sample in terms of gender, age, and nationality and was conducted among Estonian older adults in 2020. In light of the findings of earlier research, it was surprising to learn that 65+ men in Estonia take a slightly greater interest in health information compared to their female peers, which could result from men's poorer health status. Although it was more important for women to have access to a doctor from a distance, men expressed more avid interest in various digital health gadgets and services. As it happens, they were also more willing to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Thus, this study positively dispels the myth that men are dismissive about their health and information regarding it. The results of the study imply that older people in Estonia, well-educated men in particular, are enthusiastic digital technology users for health purposes which could prove to be valuable insight to those responsible for should be taken into account when developing digital services and health campaigns.

Frailty goes viral: a critical discourse analysis of COVID-19 national clinical guidelines in the United Kingdom

This paper explores how the rationing of medical care for older people by frailty score was justified and operationalised in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 was expected to overwhelm the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. In March 2020, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published the ‘COVID-19 rapid guideline: critical care in adults', which advised that clinicians use the Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) to inform decisions about which patients over the age of 65 should be offered ventilatory support. We present a Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis of this guidance and the supporting online resources. Analysis shows how the guidance merchandises the CFS as a quick and easy-to-use technology that reduces social and physical complexity into a clinical score. This stratifies older people by frailty score and permits the allocation of resources along these lines. We show how this is justified through epidemiological discourses of risk, which are merged with the language of individual mortality prediction. We discuss the proceduralisation of the CFS alongside a growing body of research that problematises its application in resource allocation. We argue that the pandemic has increased the use of the concept of frailty and that this effectively obfuscates the concept's limitations and ambiguities;the ageism implicit in the response to COVID-19 in the UK;and the relative resource scarcity facing the UK's NHS.

Characterization of Factors Predicting a Favorable Opinion of Research Applications Submitted for an Ethical Review Process.

Introduction: In Spain, biomedical research applications must receive a positive ethical opinion from Research Ethics Committees (RECs) before being executed. There is limited information on how to optimize the ethical review process to reduce delays. This study was performed to characterize variables predicting favorable opinions at the first ethical review performed by a REC. Material and Methods: The study assessed all research applications revised by a REC in 2019-2020. Data was extracted from REC's database of La Rioja, Spain. Variables collected covered three areas: (i) principal investigator's profile; (ii) study design; and (iii) ethical review process. A model based on multiple logistic regression analysis was created to identify variables explaining favorable opinions in first rounds of ethical review processes. Results: The sample included 125 applications (41 submitted in 2019, and 84 in 2020). At the first review, nine (7%) applications were rejected, 56 (45%) were approved, and the remaining 60 (48%) required at least two reviews prior to approval. When comparing both years, a 2-fold increase in the number of applications submitted, and a difference in the ratio of applications with a favorable vs. non-favorable opinion were observed. Furthermore, a model predicted 71% of probability of obtaining a favorable opinion in the first ethical review. Three variables appeared as being explanatory: if the principal investigator is either the group leader or the department's head (OR = 17.39; p < 0.001), and if the informed consent (OR = 11.79; p = 0.01), and methods and procedures (OR = 34.15; p < 0.001) are well done. Conclusions: These findings confirm an increase in the number of submissions and a difference in the ratio of applications approved by year. Findings observed also confirm deficiencies in "informed consent" and in "methods and procedures" are the two main causes of delay for favorable ethical opinions. Additionally, findings highlight the need that group leaders and heads of departments should be more involved in guiding and supervising their research teams, especially when research applications are led by less experienced researchers. Based on these findings, it is suggested that an adequate mentoring and targeted training in research could derive in more robust research applications and in smoother ethical review processes.

Assessment of an electronic system for research ethics committees document management: An observational study.

Since 1 January 2020, the Central Research Ethics Committee of the Health Ministry implemented PRIISA.BA, an in-house developed electronic system for online submission of health research applications to the 63 public and private research ethics committees (RECs) of Buenos Aires City, Argentina. This study though to compare the times to first review and the time to approval among applications submitted prior to PRIISA.BA and thereafter, across public RECs. All public RECs of the city were invited to participate. Overall, 453 applications from 10 RECs (242 pre- and 211 post-PRIISA.BA) were available for the analyses. There was a decrease in the time to first review and an increase in the time to approval after PRIISA.BA implementation. The increase in time to approval was transient and limited to the first three months. The results were consistent with analyses limited to non-COVID applications. Our results show an increase in the times to approval after the implementation of an electronic system for online submission of health research applications that, although transient, was significant. These data could be relevant to other RECs implementing this technology since it emphasizes the need of monitoring potential unnecessary delays in reviews during the critical initial period.